themcglynn.com

16 Jul

How Murdoch Reporters’ Bribes to British Cops Violate US Law & Other Truth Out

Saturday 16 July 2011

by: Jake Bernstein, ProPublica | News Analysis

Rupert Murdoch. (Photo: David Shankbone / Flickr)

Imagine you’re a Fleet Street reporter at a British tabloid with a pocketful of cash. You meet a trusted source at a pub, a police officer who tells you about the royal family’s confidential schedule in exchange for a small gratuity. You hand over a few quid and rush off with a photographer to stake out a health club where Camilla Parker-Bowles is toning her abs.

Guess what: If you work for Rupert Murdoch, you may have violated U.S. law. What the government nails you for could depend on how you and your bosses account for the sketchy deal with the cop.

If you’re entirely honest in the company’s internal books and enter the payment as a “bribe,” you’ve just created an irrefutable piece of evidence that can be used against you and your company in a prosecution by the Justice Department for violating U.S. statutes against overseas bribery. If, as is more likely, you file an expense account which refers to the cash payment as “taxis” or “office supplies,” you stand a chance of being pursued by the Securities and Exchange Commission for keeping fake records.

News International Limited, the British arm of the Murdoch empire, is a subsidiary of News Corp., a publicly traded American company which also owns the Wall Street Journal and Fox News (not to mention the Sunday Times of London, the Times of London, and the British tabloid the Sun). Because of this, experts say, News Corp. and all of its subsidiaries come under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a Watergate-era law which makes it a crime for U.S. companies to participate in bribery abroad.

The scope and number of payments remains unclear. British press reports say more than $160,000 was paid by News of the World reporters to police officers. The issue came to light last week after News International turned over a trove of internal emails to authorities.

“A small number of officers may have taken illegal payments. That is fundamentally corrupt,” Met Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson told the BBC. “If true, I will be determined to root them out, find them and put them in front of the criminal court.”

After years of relative quiet, the United States has substantially stepped up the resources to prosecute companies for violating the bribery law. There are 150 open investigations of American companies, according to the law firm Gibson Dunn & Crutcher. In 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice combined for a total of just 12 FCPA enforcement actions. By 2010 that number had jumped to 54, the law firm reports. We’ve written previously on this subject when it involved payments byAlbert Jack Stanley, a former executive at KBR.

Unless information emerges that News Corp. executives in the United States were aware of and condoned illegal behavior, it is doubtful whether the company or individual executives would face criminal prosecution in the United States, several defense lawyers said.

A prominent academic, Michael Koehler, who tracks prosecutions on his blog the FCPA Professor, is not as sure the global news giant will escape criminal prosecution.

“Look at the 2011 enforcement actions on my blog,” he says. “None of these involved high level officers or board members.”

But lack of evidence of executive complicity in bribery doesn’t protect the parent company from civil actions. Where News Corp. may be most vulnerable is under the “Books and Records” and “Internal Controls” provisions of the FCPA, according to lawyers who practice in this field.

Even if News Corp. subsidiaries recorded the bribes accurately in their books, it could land the company in difficulty with the SEC. Since the bribery was permitted in the first place, the charges would also open up the company to questions about its internal controls.

Fines for these violations can be steep. In 2009 and 2010 combined the Justice Department charged over 50 individuals and collected nearly $2 billion in criminal fines, said Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer in a recent speech. In 2010, the SEC brought in almost $530 million in corporate FCPA settlements, according to Koehler’s blog. Part of what makes it so lucrative for the government is that the SEC often requires the companies “disgorge” the gains they made from illicit activities and pay interest on them.

How the SEC would calculate the value of a scoop or a racy headline that resulted from a police bribe is an open question. Does one include a bump in weekly circulation? The long-time loyalty of readers? Until it was abruptly closed last week, the News of the World, the Sunday paper most closely linked to phone hacking, had Britain’s largest daily circulation, with 2.7 million readers.

“What was the increased revenue because of this sensational headline is more art than science,” says Koehler. “You could come up with some ballpark number.”

Another cost to News Corp. would be the company-wide review the SEC or DOJ would likely demand. The company would have to satisfy the Feds that similar payments weren’t made to government officials in other countries. These company reviews are part of the reason why FCPA inquiries can last for years, according to Koehler.

The statute of limitations on civil FCPA charges is five years. Reports about the illegal bribes seem to date back to 2006 so regulators would likely be mindful of the calendar. Companies are often rewarded for cooperating with the inquiries. “Raising a statute of limitations defense is not exactly cooperation mode,” says Koehler.

News Corp also depends on the government for its broadcast licenses. Fox Television Stations Inc. has 269 active licenses with the Federal Communications Commission, according to the agency’s website. An agency spokesman would not comment on whether FCPA violations might put those licenses in jeopardy as well.

Aiding Insecurity: Four Years of Mexico’s Drug War
Tom Barry, Truthout: “Mexico’s drug-trafficking organizations constitute a threat to regional security and to US national security, says the US government. Yet the region is becoming less secure and less safe as the result of the security emphasis of US counternarcotics initiatives… Has the Merida Initiative improved regional security? Certainly not, if measured by levels of drug-related violence, which keep escalating in Mexico, and at an even greater pace in Central America.”
Read the Article

One Thing Certain in Debt Debate: More Cuts for States
Michael Cooper, The New York Times News Service: “The rancorous debate in Washington over whether to raise the federal debt ceiling is alarming many of the nation’s governors from both parties, who fear that whatever the outcome, much-needed money will almost certainly be drained from their states. If the federal debt limit is not raised… the ensuing default will harm the economy, make it difficult for states to borrow money and delay some of the vital federal payments that states count on for everything from Medicaid to unemployment benefits.”
Read the Article

Violence Against Migrant Women Won’t End After DSK Case
Michelle Chen, Colorlines: “The narrative of the immigrant housekeeper allegedly assaulted by a European official perfectly illustrates an axiom of violence and power: the wider the gap between genders and races, the greater the latitude of injustice. Yet the same story plays out every day on an endless loop around the globe: a retaliatory rape against a young girl sends a warning to the enemy militia; a wife is pummeled into bloody silence, her bedroom beyond the purview of traditional local courts; a daughter is married off to pay down a farm debt. The stories weave into a pattern that a media-fatigued public has come to normalize.”
Read the Article

You Can’t Kill a Planet and Live on It, Too
Frank Joseph Smecker and Derrick Jensen, Truthout: “With an entire planet being slaughtered before our eyes, it’s terrifying to watch the very culture responsible for this – the culture of industrial civilization, fueled by a finite source of fossil fuels, primarily a dwindling supply of oil – thrust forward wantonly to fuel its insatiable appetite for ‘growth.’ Deluded by myths of progress and suffering from the psychosis of technomania complicated by addiction to depleting oil reserves, industrial society leaves a crescendo of atrocities in its wake.”
Read the Article

How Important Is Class Size After All?
Marion Brady, The Washington Post: “Class size is one of a long list of education-related issues about which arguments rage. Generally speaking, educators want small classes because they allow more individual attention. Those averse to taxes want large classes because they’re cheaper. Many think class size makes no important difference. Bill Gates speaks approvingly of one master teacher, alone in a television studio, lecturing millions of kids.”
Read the Article

Slow Flow of Immigrants Already Impacting California Farms?
Elena Shore and Jonah Most, New America Media: “The number of immigrants illegally crossing into the United States from Mexico has declined according to a new study, and some California farmers are already seeing the effects on their crops… Net immigration from Mexico has fallen sharply, and may even be down to zero, according to a recent study by Princeton University demographer Douglas S. Massey. Massey credits several factors for the shift: smaller family sizes and more job opportunities in Mexico, rising border crime, and immigration crackdowns in the United States.”
Read the Article

State Fracking Rules Could Allow Drilling Near New York City Water Supply Tunnels
Nicholas Kusnetz, ProPublica: “The latest draft of guidelines for hydraulic fracturing in New York could open the door to drilling within 1,000 feet of aging underground tunnels that carry water to New York City – a far cry from the seven-mile buffer once sought by city officials. The draft environmental impact statement, released last week by state officials, is a crucial step toward allowing high-volume hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in New York.”
Read the Article

G20: Speculation and Agricultural Price Volatility
Timothy A. Wise, TripleCrisis: “The G20 agriculture ministers dodged most of the tough issues in their meeting last month in Paris, leaving the heavy lifting on France’s ambitious G20 agenda to finance ministers later this year. Among the dodged issues were agricultural price volatility and the so-called ‘financialization’ of commodity markets. Despite a relatively ambitious set of reforms proposed by an interagency group, the agriculture ministers ‘action plan’ took very few actions beyond pushing for better information on grain inventories.”
Read the Article

Click here for more Truthout articles

BUZZFLASH DAILY HEADLINES
 
 
The BuzzFlash commentary for Truthout will return Monday.

 

Blundering Toward Recession: Urgency and Sense Elude the House
Read the Article at The New York Times

Murdoch’s Political Money Trail
Read the Article at The Daily Beast

Turkey Charges 14 Militants With Anti-US Plot
Read the Article at Yahoo! News

California Temporarly Reinstates “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”
Read the Article at The New York Times

How the US Government Uses Its Media Servants to Attack Real Journalism
Read the Article at Salon

Another Setback for Consumers: White House Gives Into GOP and Won’t Appoint Elizabeth Warren to Head Consumer Bureau
Read the Article at Bloomberg

How More Flexibility in Federal Education Funding Will Hurt Low-Income and Minority Students
Read the Article at Unfinished Business

Click here for more BuzzFlash headlines

Comments are closed.

© 2020 themcglynn.com | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

Global Positioning System Gazettewordpress logo